Planting Misinformation in the Human Mind: A 30-Year Investigation of the Malleability of Memory
Loftus, Elizabeth F.
Learning & Memory 12, no. 4 (2005): 361-366
https://doi.org/10.1101/lm.94705
“Long ago, researchers showed that certain experimental conditions are associated with greater susceptibility to misinformation. So, for example, people are particularly prone to having their memories be affected by misinformation when it is introduced after the passage of time has allowed the original event memory to fade (Loftus et al. 1978). One reason this may be true is that with the passage of time, the event memory is weakened, and thus, there is less likelihood that a discrepancy is noticed while the misinformation is being processed. In the extreme, with super-long time intervals between an event and subsequent misinformation, the event memory might be so weak that it is as if it had not been presented at all.”
Seligman, Martin.
Annual Review of Medicine 23, no. 1 (1972): 407-412.
Glenberg, Arthur
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20, no. 1 (1997): 41-50.
James, William
The Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 1, no. 18 (1904): 477-491
Haidt, Jonathan
Science 316, no. 5827 (2007): 998-1002
Haidt, Jonathan
Psychological Review 108, no. 4 (2001): 814
Schwartz, Daniel L.
Cognitive Psychology 38, no. 3 (1999): 433-464
Pinker, Steven
Studies in the Evolution of Language 3 (2003): 16-37
Loftus, Elizabeth F.
Learning & Memory 12, no. 4 (2005): 361-366
Loftus, Elizabeth F.
American Psychologist 48, no. 5 (1993): 518
Posner, Michael I.
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 32, no. 1 (1980): 3-25.
Tomasello, Michael, Malinda Carpenter, Josep Call, Tanya Behne, and Henrike Moll
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28, no. 5 (2005): 675-691.
Tomasello, Michael, Ann C. Kruger, and Hilary H. Ratner
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16, no. 3 (1993): 495-511
Minsky, Marvin
Cognitive Constraints on Communication, pp. 175-200. Springer, Dordrecht, 1980
Sloman, Steven A.
Psychological Bulletin 119, no. 1 (1996): 3
Seligman, Martin
Psychological Review 77, no. 5 (1970): 406.