Jokes and the Logic of the Cognitive Unconscious
Minsky*, Marvin
Cognitive Constraints on Communication, pp. 175-200. Springer, Dordrecht, 1980
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-9188-6_10
* Professor at MIT, winner of Turing Award (among others)
“In trying to classify humorous phenomena, Sigmund Freud asks whether this should be called a joke, “for the fact is we do not yet know in what the characteristic of being a joke resides.” Let us agree that some of the cake-joke’s humor is related to a logical absurdity—leaving aside whether it is in the logic itself, or in keeping track of it. Later Freud goes on to ask what is the status of a “knife without a blade which has no handle?” This absurdity has a different quality; some representation is being misused—like a frame without a picture.
Freud, who never returned to the subject after writing his 1905 book on the theory of jokes, suggested that “censors” in the mind form powerful, unconscious barriers that make it difficult to think “forbidden” thoughts. But jokes can elude these censors—to create the pleasure of unearned release of psychic energy, which is discharged in the form of laughter. He explains why jokes tend to be compact and condensed, with double meanings: this is to fool the childishly simple-minded censors, who see only innocent surface meanings and fail to penetrate the disguise of the forbidden wishes. ”
Seligman, Martin.
Annual Review of Medicine 23, no. 1 (1972): 407-412.
Richards, Blake A., Timothy Lillicrap, et al.
Nature Neuroscience 22, no. 11 (2019): 1761-1770.
Glenberg, Arthur
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20, no. 1 (1997): 41-50.
Crick, Francis, and Christof Koch
Seminars in the Neurosciences, Saunders Scientific Publications, vol. 2 (1990): 263-275.
James, William
The Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 1, no. 18 (1904): 477-491
Haidt, Jonathan
Science 316, no. 5827 (2007): 998-1002
Haidt, Jonathan
Psychological Review 108, no. 4 (2001): 814
Schwartz, Daniel L.
Cognitive Psychology 38, no. 3 (1999): 433-464
Pinker, Steven
Studies in the Evolution of Language 3 (2003): 16-37
Loftus, Elizabeth F.
Learning & Memory 12, no. 4 (2005): 361-366
Loftus, Elizabeth F.
American Psychologist 48, no. 5 (1993): 518
Posner, Michael I.
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 32, no. 1 (1980): 3-25.
Tomasello, Michael, Malinda Carpenter, Josep Call, Tanya Behne, and Henrike Moll
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28, no. 5 (2005): 675-691.
Tomasello, Michael, Ann C. Kruger, and Hilary H. Ratner
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16, no. 3 (1993): 495-511
Tononi, Giulio, and Christof Koch
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 370, no. 1668 (2015): 20140167
Minsky, Marvin
Cognitive Constraints on Communication, pp. 175-200. Springer, Dordrecht, 1980
Eagleman, David M.
Current Opinion in Neurobiology 18, no. 2 (2008): 131-136
Kilner, James M., Karl J. Friston, and Chris D. Frith
Cognitive Processing 8, no. 3 (2007): 159-166
Krakauer, John W., Asif A. Ghazanfar, Alex Gomez-Marin, Malcolm A. MacIver, and David Poeppel
Neuron 93, no. 3 (2017): 480-490
Morris, Richard GM, Paul Garrud, JNP al Rawlins, and John O'Keefe
Nature 297, no. 5868 (1982): 681-683
Damasio, Hanna, Thomas Grabowski, Randall Frank, Albert M. Galaburda, and Antonio R. Damasio
Science 264, no. 5162 (1994): 1102-1105
Haim, Lucile Ben, and David H. Rowitch
Nature Reviews Neuroscience 18, no. 1 (2017): 31
Damasio, Antonio R.
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 353, no. 1377 (1998): 1879-1882
Sloman, Steven A.
Psychological Bulletin 119, no. 1 (1996): 3
Seligman, Martin
Psychological Review 77, no. 5 (1970): 406.