Ultimate Physical Limits to Computation
Lloyd, Seth
Nature 406, no. 6799 (2000): 1047-1054
https://doi.org/10.1038/35023282
“Over the past half century, the amount of information that computers are capable of processing and the rate at which they process it has doubled every two years, a phenomenon known as Moore’s law. A variety of technologies—most recently, integrated circuits—have enabled this exponential increase in information processing power. There is no particular reason why Moore’s law should continue to hold: it is a law of human ingenuity, not of nature. At some point, Moore’s law will break down. The question is, When? [...]
The purpose of this article is to determine just what limits the laws of physics place on the power of computers. At first, this might seem a futile task: since we don’t know the technologies by which computers one thousand, one hundred, or even ten years in the future will be constructed, how can we determine the physical limits of those technologies? In fact, as will now be shown, a great deal can be determined concerning the ultimate physical limits of computation simply from knowledge of the speed of light...”
Wickham, Hadley
Journal of statistical software 59 (2014): 1-23.
LeCun, Yann, Yoshua Bengio, and Geoffrey Hinton
Nature 521, no. 7553 (2015): 436-444.
Bennett, Charles H., Gilles Brassard, and N. David Mermin
Physical Review Letters 68, no. 5 (1992): 557
Minsky, Marvin
Communications of the ACM 43, no. 8 (2000): 66-73
Turing, Alan
Proceedings of the London mathematical society 2, no. 1 (1937): 230-265
Lloyd, Seth
Nature 406, no. 6799 (2000): 1047-1054
Knuth, Donald E.
The Computer Journal 27, no. 2 (1984): 97-111
Brooks, Frederick P.
IEEE Computer 20, no. 4 (1987): 10-19
Lamport, Leslie, Robert Shostak, and Marshall Pease
ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems (TOPLAS) 4, no. 3 (1982): 382–401
Lindley, Sam, Philip Wadler, and Jeremy Yallop
Journal of Functional Programming 20, no. 1 (2010): 51-69
Wadler, Philip
ACM SIGPLAN Notices 47, no. 9 (2012): 273-286
Richards, Blake A., Timothy Lillicrap, et al.
Nature Neuroscience 22, no. 11 (2019): 1761-1770.