A Deep Learning Framework for Neuroscience
Richards, Blake A., Timothy Lillicrap, et al.
Nature Neuroscience 22, no. 11 (2019): 1761-1770.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-019-0520-2
“Major technical advances are revolutionizing our ability to observe and manipulate brains at a large scale and to quantify complex behaviors. How should we use this data to develop models of the brain? When the classical framework for systems neuroscience was developed, we could only record from small sets of neurons. In this framework, a researcher observes neural activity, develops a theory of what individual neurons compute, then assembles a circuit-level theory of how the neurons combine their operations. This approach has worked well for simple computations. For example, we know how central pattern generators control rhythmic movements, how the vestibulo-ocular reflex promotes gaze stabilization and how the retina computes motion. But can this classical framework scale up to recordings of thousands of neurons and all of the behaviors that we may wish to account for? Arguably, we have not had as much success with the classical approach in large neural circuits that perform a multitude of functions, like the neocortex or hippocampus. In such circuits, researchers often find neurons with response properties that are difficult to summarize in a succinct manner. ”
Wickham, Hadley
Journal of statistical software 59 (2014): 1-23.
LeCun, Yann, Yoshua Bengio, and Geoffrey Hinton
Nature 521, no. 7553 (2015): 436-444.
Glenberg, Arthur
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20, no. 1 (1997): 41-50.
Crick, Francis, and Christof Koch
Seminars in the Neurosciences, Saunders Scientific Publications, vol. 2 (1990): 263-275.
James, William
The Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 1, no. 18 (1904): 477-491
Bennett, Charles H., Gilles Brassard, and N. David Mermin
Physical Review Letters 68, no. 5 (1992): 557
Tononi, Giulio, and Christof Koch
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 370, no. 1668 (2015): 20140167
Eagleman, David M.
Current Opinion in Neurobiology 18, no. 2 (2008): 131-136
Kilner, James M., Karl J. Friston, and Chris D. Frith
Cognitive Processing 8, no. 3 (2007): 159-166
Krakauer, John W., Asif A. Ghazanfar, Alex Gomez-Marin, Malcolm A. MacIver, and David Poeppel
Neuron 93, no. 3 (2017): 480-490
Morris, Richard GM, Paul Garrud, JNP al Rawlins, and John O'Keefe
Nature 297, no. 5868 (1982): 681-683
Damasio, Hanna, Thomas Grabowski, Randall Frank, Albert M. Galaburda, and Antonio R. Damasio
Science 264, no. 5162 (1994): 1102-1105
Haim, Lucile Ben, and David H. Rowitch
Nature Reviews Neuroscience 18, no. 1 (2017): 31
Damasio, Antonio R.
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 353, no. 1377 (1998): 1879-1882
Minsky, Marvin
Communications of the ACM 43, no. 8 (2000): 66-73
Turing, Alan
Proceedings of the London mathematical society 2, no. 1 (1937): 230-265
Lloyd, Seth
Nature 406, no. 6799 (2000): 1047-1054
Knuth, Donald E.
The Computer Journal 27, no. 2 (1984): 97-111
Brooks, Frederick P.
IEEE Computer 20, no. 4 (1987): 10-19
Lamport, Leslie, Robert Shostak, and Marshall Pease
ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems (TOPLAS) 4, no. 3 (1982): 382–401
Lindley, Sam, Philip Wadler, and Jeremy Yallop
Journal of Functional Programming 20, no. 1 (2010): 51-69
Wadler, Philip
ACM SIGPLAN Notices 47, no. 9 (2012): 273-286
Richards, Blake A., Timothy Lillicrap, et al.
Nature Neuroscience 22, no. 11 (2019): 1761-1770.