A Survey of Socially Interactive Robots
Fong, Terrence, Illah Nourbakhsh, and Kerstin Dautenhahn
Robotics and Autonomous Systems 42, no. 3-4 (2003): 143-166.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8890(02)00372-X
“For the purposes of this paper, we use the term “socially interactive robots” to describe robots for which social interaction plays a key role. We do this, not to introduce another class of social robot, but rather to distinguish these robots from other robots that involve “conventional” human–robot interaction, such as those used in teleoperation scenarios. […]
Socially interactive robots operate as partners, peers or assistants, which means that they need to exhibit a certain degree of adaptability and flexibility to drive the interaction with a wide range of humans. Socially interactive robots can have different shapes and functions, ranging from robots whose sole purpose and only task is to engage people in social interactions to robots that are engineered to adhere to social norms in order to fulfill a range of tasks in human-inhabited environments.”
Lynch, Kevin M., and Matthew T. Mason
The International Journal of Robotics Research 15, no. 6 (1996): 533-556.
Fong, Terrence et al.
Robotics and Autonomous Systems 42, no. 3-4 (2003): 143-166.
Solberg, James R. et al.
The International Journal of Robotics Research 27, no. 5 (2008): 529-548.
Chirikjian, Gregory S., and Joel W. Burdick
IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation 11, no. 6 (1995): 781-793
Vincent, Julian FV.
Journal of Bionic Engineering 3, no. 3 (2006): 161-177
Geim, Andre, and Konstantin Novoselov
Nature Materials 6, no. 3 (2007): 183-191.
Frenkiel, Richard H., B. R. Badrinath, Joan Borràs, and Roy D. Yates
IEEE Personal Communications 7, no. 2 (2000): 66-71
Craford, M. George
MRS bulletin 25, no. 10 (2000): 27-31
Schwierz, Frank
Nature nanotechnology 5, no. 7 (2010): 487
Shannon, Claude E.
Proceedings of the IRE 37, no. 1 (1949): 10-21
Bergh, Arpad et al.
Physics Today 54, no. 12 (2001): 42-47.